Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/packs/public.jsx`:
Some of the removed dead code was split from this code in
`app/javascript/core/public.js` and `app/javascript/core/settings.js`.
Removed this dead code, and removed `app/javascript/core/public.js`
altogether.
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/packs/public.jsx`:
Upstream updated code that we actually moved to `app/javascript/core/settings.js`.
Applied the changes there.
Conflicts:
- `.eslintrc.js`:
Upstream moved a configuration block in which we had added a glitch-only
path.
Moved the configuration block as upstream did.
- other files:
Upstream reordered imports, and those files had different ones.
Kept our version and reordered imports using the same rules.
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/packs/admin.jsx`:
Upstream reworked imports, but we had many changes.
Reworked imports as upstream did.
- `app/javascript/packs/public.jsx`:
Upstream reworked imports, but we had many changes.
Reworked imports as upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Upstream updated its README, while we have a completely different one.
Kept our README.
- `app/controllers/concerns/web_app_controller_concern.rb`:
Conflict because of glitch-soc's theming system.
Additionally, glitch-soc has different behavior regarding moved accounts.
Ported some of the changes, but kept our overall behavior.
- `app/javascript/packs/admin.js`:
Code changes actually applied to `app/javascript/core/admin.js`
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/settings/preferences_controller.rb`:
Upstream dropping `digest` from notifications emails while we have more
notification emails settings.
Removed `digest` from our list while keeping our extra settings.
- `app/javascript/packs/admin.js`:
Conflicts caused by glitch-soc's theming system.
Applied the changes to `app/javascript/core/admin.js`.
- `app/views/settings/preferences/other/show.html.haml`:
Upstream removed a setting close to a glitch-soc-only setting.
Applied upstream's change.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Our README is completely different. Discarded upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/packs/mailer.js`:
We had removed the file. Move the changes to `app/javascript/core/mailer.js`.
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/packs/admin.js`:
Conflicts due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Upstream changes have been ported to `app/javascript/core/admin.js`
- `app/models/trends/statuses.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's option to allow CWed toots in trends.
Ported upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/form/admin_settings.rb`:
New setting added upstream. Ported it.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Upstream removed RTL classes. Did the same.
- `config/settings.yml`:
New setting added upstream. Ported it.
Conflicts:
- `.github/dependabot.yml`:
Updated upstream, we deleted it to not be flooded by Depandabot.
Kept deleted.
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Puma updated on both sides, went for the most recent version.
- `app/controllers/api/v1/mutes_controller.rb`:
Upstream updated the serializer to support timed mutes, while
glitch-soc added a custom API ages ago to get information that
is already available elsewhere.
Dropped the glitch-soc-specific API, went with upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/core/admin.js`:
Conflict due to changing how assets are loaded. Went with upstream.
- `app/javascript/packs/public.js`:
Conflict due to changing how assets are loaded. Went with upstream.
- `app/models/mute.rb`:
🤷
- `app/models/user.rb`:
New user setting added upstream while we have glitch-soc-specific
user settings. Added upstream's user setting.
- `config/settings.yml`:
Upstream added a new user setting close to a user setting we had
changed the defaults for. Added the new upstream setting.
- `package.json`:
Upstream dependency updated “too close” to a glitch-soc-specific
dependency. No real conflict. Updated the dependency.
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/packs/public.js`:
Conflict because part of that file has been split to
`app/javascript/core/settings.js`. Ported those changes
there.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/statuses_controller.rb`:
Upstream disabled the embed controller for reblogs.
Not a real conflict, but glitch-soc has an extra line to deal
with its theming system.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/packs/public.js`:
Upstream made changes to get rid of most inline CSS, this changes
javascript for public pages, which in glitch are split between
different files. Ported those changes.
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Upstream changed the block check in `Status#permitted_for` to
include domain-block checks. Not a real conflict with glitch-soc,
but our scope is slightly different, as our scope for
unauthenticated access do not include instance-local toots.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/serializers/rest/instance_serializer.rb`:
Not a real conflict, upstream added a new field to the instance
serializer, the conflict is one line above since we added more of
that.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/views/settings/profiles/show.html.haml`:
Upstream got rid of most inline CSS and moved hidden elements
to data attributes in the process, in fields were we have
different values.
Ported upstream changes while keeping our glitch-specific
values.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Upstream got rid of inline CSS on an HAML line we treat
differently, stripping empty text nodes.
Ported upstream changes to the style attribute, keeping
the empty text node stripping behavior.
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/packs/public.js`:
Upstream modified code that we split between multiple files due
to glitch-soc's theming system.
Ported those changes.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Our README.md files are completely different. Discarded upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/core/admin.js`:
Updating rails-ujs, no real conflict, but a comment to close to changed
code. Various glitch-soc-only files have been updated to match those changes,
though.
- `package.json`:
No real conflict, just an additional dependency in glitch-soc that was too
close to something updated upstream. Took upstream's changes.
Conflicts:
- `config/locales/en.yml`
No real conflict, upstream added a translatable string “too close” to
one specific to glitch-soc
- `lib/mastodon/statuses_cli.rb`
Fixes made upstream, while changed in glitch-soc to keep bookmarked statuses
- `package.json`
No real conflict, additional dependency in glitch-soc
Conflicts:
- app/javascript/mastodon/features/compose/components/compose_form.js
Upstream cleaned up a bit, including on lines in which
we replaced the hardcoded 500 character limit with a maxChar
constant. Applied the changes while keeping maxChar instead of 500.
- app/javascript/packs/public.js
Moved upstream's new animated avatar hover handling in
app/javascript/core/public.js
- app/javascript/styles/fonts/montserrat.scss
Upstream fixed local font name, applied those changes.
- app/javascript/styles/fonts/roboto.scss
Upstream fixed local font name, applied those changes.
- lib/mastodon/version.rb
Upstream made repo URL configurable, did the same, but
default to glitch-soc
Conflicts:
- app/controllers/following_accounts_controller.rb
Conflicts were due to glitch-soc's theming system.
- app/javascript/packs/public.js
Some code has been change upstream, but it has been
moved to app/javascript/core/settings.js in glitch-soc.
Applied the changes there.
Conflicts:
- app/controllers/admin/base_controller.rb
- app/controllers/filters_controller.rb
- app/controllers/invites_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/deletes_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/exports_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/follower_domains_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/migrations_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/notifications_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/preferences_controller.rb
- app/controllers/settings/two_factor_authentication/recovery_codes_controller.rb
- app/javascript/packs/public.js
- app/views/settings/profiles/show.html.haml
Conflicts were mostly due to the addition of body classes to the settings page,
this was caused by rejecting upstream changes for most of those files and
modifying Settings::BaseController instead.
Another cause of conflicts was the deletion of client-side checking of
display name / bio length, this was modified in app/javascript/core/settings.js
instead.
Conflicts:
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md
Took our version.
- CONTRIBUTING.md
Updated the embedded copy of upstream's version.
- README.md
Took our version.
- app/policies/status_policy.rb
Not a real conflict, took code from both.
- app/views/layouts/embedded.html.haml
Added upstream's changes (dns-prefetch) and fixed
`%body.embed`
- app/views/settings/preferences/show.html.haml
Reverted some of upstream changes, as we have a
page dedicated for flavours and skins.
- config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb
Kept our version of the CSP.
- config/initializers/doorkeeper.rb
Not a real conflict, took code from both.
Conflicts:
app/views/layouts/application.html.haml
Edited:
app/helpers/application_helper.rb
app/views/admin/domain_blocks/new.html.haml
Conflict wasn't really one, just two changes too close to one another.
Edition was to adapt the class names for themes to class names for
skins and flavours.
Also edited app/views/admin/domain_blocks/new.html.haml to strip the
duplicate admin pack inclusion thing.
Conflicts:
.circleci/config.yml
app/controllers/authorize_follows_controller.rb
app/javascript/packs/public.js
Moved new stuff from packs/public.js to core/public.js.
Added appropriate use_pack in new controllers.
Conflicts:
app/models/status.rb
db/migrate/20180528141303_fix_accounts_unique_index.rb
db/schema.rb
Resolved by taking upstream changes (no real conflicts, just glitch-soc
specific code too close to actual changes).
