Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Upstream changed their README, we have our own.
Kept ours.
- `app/helpers/application_helper.rb`:
Minor code style fix upstream, on a line that is different in glitch-soc
due to the different theming system.
Applied the code style fix to our own code.
- `app/views/settings/preferences/appearance/show.html.haml`:
Code style fix on a line next to lines exclusive to glitch-soc.
Applied upstream changes.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream updated a dependency textually close to a glitch-soc-only
dependency.
Updated the dependency like upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Upstream switched to pushing to both DockerHub and GitHub Container
Repository, while glitch-soc was already pushing to the latter only.
Updated our configuration to be slightly more consistent with upstream's
naming and styling, but kept our behavior.
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Updated dependencies textually too close to glitch-soc only hcaptcha
dependency.
Updated dependencies as upstream did.
- `README.md`:
Upstream updated its README, but we have a completely different one.
Kept our README, though it probably should be reworked at some point.
- `app/views/auth/sessions/two_factor.html.haml`:
Minor style fix upstream that's on a line glitch-soc removed because
of its different theming system.
Kept our file as is.
- `spec/controllers/health_controller_spec.rb`:
This file apparently did not exist upstream, upstream created it with
different contents but it is functionally the same.
Switched to upstream's version of the file.
- `spec/presenters/instance_presenter_spec.rb`:
Upstream changed the specs around `GITHUB_REPOSITORY`, while glitch-soc
had its own code because it's a fork and does not have the same default
source URL.
Took upstream's change, but with glitch-soc's repo as the default case.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream dependencies textually too close to a glitch-soc only one.
Updated dependencies as upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Upstream README has been changed, but we have a completely different one.
Kept our `README.md`.
- `lib/sanitize_ext/sanitize_config.rb`:
Upstream added support for more incoming HTML tags (a large subset of what
glitch-soc accepts).
Change the code style to match upstream's but otherwise do not change our
code.
- `spec/lib/sanitize_config_spec.rb`:
Upstream added support for more incoming HTML tags (a large subset of what
glitch-soc accepts).
Kept our version, since the tests are mostly glitch-soc's, except for cases
which are purposefuly different.
Conflicts:
- `.prettierignore`:
Upstream added a line at the end of the file, while glitch-soc had its own
extra lines.
Took upstream's change.
- `CONTRIBUTING.md`:
We have our custom CONTRIBUTING.md quoting upstream. Upstream made changes.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/application_controller.rb`:
Upstream made code style changes in a method that is entirely replaced
in glitch-soc.
Ignored the change.
- `app/models/account.rb`:
Code style changes textually close to glitch-soc-specific changes.
Ported upstream changes.
- `lib/sanitize_ext/sanitize_config.rb`:
Upstream code style changes.
Ignored them.
Conflicts:
- `.github/dependabot.yml`:
Upstream made changes while we have dropped this file.
Keep the file deleted.
- `.prettierignore`:
Upstream made changes at the end of the file, where we
had our extra lines.
Just moved our extra lines back at the end.
- `app/serializers/initial_state_serializer.rb`:
Upstream code style changes.
Applied them.
- `app/services/backup_service.rb`:
Upstream code style changes.
Applied them.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Minor upstream change, our README is completely different.
Kept ours.
- `lib/tasks/assets.rake`:
glitch-soc has extra code to deal with its theming system,
upstream changed a line that exists in glitch-soc.
Applied upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Upstream updated `docker/build-push-action`, and we a different config
for `docker/metadata-action` so the lines directly above were different,
but it's not a real conflict.
Upgraded `docker/build-push-action` as upstream did.
- `app/javascript/mastodon/features/compose/components/compose_form.js`:
Upstream changed the codestyle near a line we had modified to accommodate
configurable character count.
Kept our change.
Conflicts:
- `config/i18n-tasks.yml`:
Upstream added new ignored strings, glitch-soc has extra ignored strings
because of the theming system.
Added upstream's changes.
* Add --include-subdomains option to tootctl domains purge
* Add support for '*.' subdomain wildcard patterns in `tootctl domains purge`
* Fix custom emojis deletion not following subdomain and URI options
* Change `tootctl domains purge` to not purge domain blocks unless --purge-domain-blocks is passed
* Refactor `tootctl domains purge`
* Add feedback on deleted domain blocks
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Discarded upstream changes: we have our own README
- `app/controllers/follower_accounts_controller.rb`:
Port upstream's minor refactoring
Conflicts:
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Our config file is pretty different from upstream.
Upstream changed CSP directive `script-src` to include
`wasm-unsafe-eval` instead of `unsafe-eval`, which we
did not include.
Added `wasm-unsafe-eval` to `script-src` to fix
execution of the OCR web worker.
- `package.json`:
Upstream updated a dependency (`array-includes`) textually
adjacent to a glitch-soc-only dependency (`atrament`).
Updated `array-includes` as upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `app/views/admin/announcements/edit.html.haml`:
Upstream change too close to theming-related glitch-soc change.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/views/admin/announcements/new.html.haml`
Upstream change too close to theming-related glitch-soc change.
Ported upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/account.rb`:
Conflict because we (glitch-soc) have disabled trending of posts without
review.
Discarded that upstream change.
- `app/views/admin/settings/discovery/show.html.haml`:
Just an extra setting in glitch-soc.
Kept that extra setting.
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/mastodon/features/compose/components/poll_form.js`:
glitch-soc change because of having changed the default number of
available poll options.
Applied upstream's changes while keeping glitch-soc's default number of
poll options.
- `public/oops.png`:
We had a minor graphics change, probably not worth diverging from upstream.
Took upstream version.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/home_controller.rb`:
Upstream made it so `/web` is available to non-logged-in users
and `/` redirects to `/web` instead of `/about`.
Kept our version since glitch-soc's WebUI doesn't have what's
needed yet and I think /about is still a much better landing
page anyway.
- `app/models/form/admin_settings.rb`:
Upstream added new settings, and glitch-soc had an extra setting.
Not really a conflict.
Added upstream's new settings.
- `app/serializers/initial_state_serializer.rb`:
Upstream added a new `server` initial state object.
Not really a conflict.
Merged upstream's changes.
- `app/views/admin/settings/edit.html.haml`:
Upstream added new settings.
Not really a conflict.
Merged upstream's changes.
- `app/workers/scheduler/feed_cleanup_scheduler.rb`:
Upstream refactored that part and removed the file.
Ported our relevant changes into `app/lib/vacuum/feeds_vacuum.rb`
- `config/settings.yml`:
Upstream added new settings.
Not a real conflict.
Added upstream's new settings.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/settings/preferences_controller.rb`:
Upstream dropping `digest` from notifications emails while we have more
notification emails settings.
Removed `digest` from our list while keeping our extra settings.
- `app/javascript/packs/admin.js`:
Conflicts caused by glitch-soc's theming system.
Applied the changes to `app/javascript/core/admin.js`.
- `app/views/settings/preferences/other/show.html.haml`:
Upstream removed a setting close to a glitch-soc-only setting.
Applied upstream's change.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/admin/base_controller.rb`:
Minor conflict caused by glitch-soc's theming system.
- `app/javascript/mastodon/initial_state.js`:
Minor conflict caused by glitch-soc making use of max_toot_chars.
- `app/models/form/admin_settings.rb`:
Minor conflict caused by glitch-soc's theming system.
- `app/models/trends.rb`:
Minor conflict caused by glitch-soc having more granular
notification settings for trends.
- `app/views/admin/accounts/index.html.haml`:
Minor conflict caused by glitch-soc's theming system.
- `app/views/admin/instances/show.html.haml`:
Minor conflict caused by glitch-soc's theming system.
- `app/views/layouts/application.html.haml`:
Minor conflict caused by glitch-soc's theming system.
- `app/views/settings/preferences/notifications/show.html.haml`:
Minor conflict caused by glitch-soc having more granular
notification settings for trends.
- `config/navigation.rb`:
Minor conflict caused by glitch-soc having additional
navigation items for the theming system while upstream
slightly changed every line.
Conflicts:
- `package.json`:
Upstream updated `jest`, moving its config in a separate file.
This config was modified in glitch-soc, so the corresponding changes have
been ported to `jest.config.js`
* Bump version to 3.5.2
* Change some entries to be more clear
* Add some extra notes
* Fix line wrap
Co-authored-by: Eugen Rochko <eugen@zeonfederated.com>
Conflicts:
- `package.json`:
Not really a conflict, upstream updated a dependency textually adjacent to a
glitch-soc-only one.
Updated the dependency as upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/packs/admin.js`:
Conflicts due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Upstream changes have been ported to `app/javascript/core/admin.js`
- `app/models/trends/statuses.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's option to allow CWed toots in trends.
Ported upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Not a real conflict, just an upstream dependency udpated
textually too close to a glitch-soc-only dependency.
Updated dependencies like upstream.
- `app/controllers/settings/preferences_controller.rb`:
Upstream added settings where we had extra glitch-soc-specific settings.
Added upstream's new settings.
- `app/models/user.rb`:
Upstream added settings where we had extra glitch-soc-specific settings.
Added upstream's new settings.
- `config/i18n-tasks.yml`:
Not a real conflict, just a new upstream line too textually close to
a glitch-soc-only line.
Ported upstream's change.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/concerns/sign_in_token_authentication_concern.rb`:
Upstream removed this file, while glitch-soc had changes to deal with
its theming system.
Removed the file like upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `app/lib/formatter.rb`:
Upstream completely refactored the formatting code and removed that file,
while glitch-soc had code for Markdown and HTML toots.
Took upstream code, glitch-soc changes will be re-implemented on top of the
refactored classes in a later commit.
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Upstream refactored status edit handling and moved code to
`app/models/concerns/status_snapshot_concern.rb`.
Applied glitch-soc's changes to that file.
- `app/serializers/activitypub/note_serializer.rb`:
Not really a conflict, just a line added too close to one modified by
glitch-soc.
Applied upstream changes while keeping the glitch-soc-modified one.
- `app/services/update_status_service.rb`:
Not really a conflict, upstream modified a line adjacent to one added by
glitch-soc.
Applied upstream changes while keeping the glitch-soc line.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Upstream refactored formatting, glitch-soc changed the markup slightly.
Applied upstream changes.
- `spec/lib/formatter_spec.rb`:
Upstream completely refactored the formatting code and removed that file,
while glitch-soc had code for Markdown and HTML toots.
Took upstream code, glitch-soc changes will be re-implemented on top of the
refactored classes in a later commit.
