Conflicts:
- `app/models/form/admin_settings.rb`:
Upstream changed code style change, including on a line modified by glitch-soc.
Kept glitch-soc's line but with the code style change applied.
Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Conflict caused by the `json` gem thing once again.
Updated as upstream did, but keeping the most recent `json` version.
- `spec/helpers/application_helper_spec.rb`:
Upstream refactored a bunch of specs, including one place that differs
because of glitch-soc's theming system.
Refactored as upstream did, adapting it for glitch-soc's theming system.
Conflicts:
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream reworked the CSP, we kept our version for now.
- `spec/requests/content_security_policy_spec.rb`:
Upstream reworked the CSP, we kept our version for now.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/api/v1/accounts/relationships_controller.rb`:
We differed by listing suspended users when requesting relationships.
Updated to upstream's code.
Conflicts:
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Conflict because we had updated the `json-ld` gem to fix a yanked dependency.
Kept our version of `json-ld` while updating other dependencies.
Conflicts:
- `lib/sanitize_ext/sanitize_config.rb`:
Upstream enforced new code style rules, where we had different code.
Applied the new code style rules.
Conflicts:
- `package.json`:
Upstream removed a dependency textually close to a glitch-only dependency.
Updated as upstream while keeping our dependency.
* Revert "Fix image and media loading when using external storage server"
This reverts commit 6cfa0245ca.
* Revert "Change glitch-soc's CSP config to match upstream's closer (#2474)"
This reverts commit d59196e170.
Conflicts:
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream changed how asset host CSP directives are used, and glitch-soc has
a pretty different CSP file.
It may be worth reconsidering the differences between upstream and glitch-soc
but for now, just port the change.
Conflicts:
- `spec/controllers/api/v1/timelines/tag_controller_spec.rb`:
Glitch-soc had a few extra lines in this file to account for a different
default setting. This file got replaced by
`spec/requests/api/v1/timelines/tag_spec.rb`, into which the glitch-soc
additions were moved too.
Additional changes:
- `spec/requests/api/v1/statuses/sources_spec.rb`:
Add glitch-soc-only attribute `content_type`.
Conflicts:
- `config/environments/production.rb`:
Upstream enforced a code style change and glitch-soc had a few different lines.
Applied upstream's code style to glitch-soc's changes.
Conflicts:
- `config/initializers/cors.rb`:
Upstream refactored this file, and glitch-soc had local changes.
I could not find the rationale for the glitch-soc changes, so I
used upstream's version.
Conflicts:
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream added some code to add the Identity Provider's sign-in endpoint to
the `form-action` Content Security Policy directive but our version of the
file is pretty different.
Ported the change.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/form/admin_settings.rb`:
Upstream added the notion of overriden settings, while we had extra code for
pseudo-settings (only used to combine flavour and skin in a single select
field).
Ported upstream changes.
- `config/i18n-tasks.yml`:
Upstream added `simple_form.overridden` to `ignore_unused`,
we had `simple_form.glitch_only`.
Added `simple_form.glitch_only` as well.
Conflicts:
- `app/views/settings/preferences/other/show.html.haml`:
Upstream moved some settings, where glitch-soc has an extra setting.
Ported upstream changes, moving the same settings as them.
Conflicts:
- `.rubocop_todo.yml`:
Upstream regenerated this file, glitch-soc had a specific ignore.
- `README.md`:
Upstream updated its README, but glitch-soc has a completely different one.
Kept glitch-soc's README
Conflicts:
- `app/models/account.rb`:
Upstream added new validations close to lines on which glitch-soc had
modified validations to handle custom limits set through environment
variables.
Ported upstream changes.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream added `AZURE_ALIAS_HOST`. Glitch-soc's version of the file is
completely different.
Added `AZURE_ALIAS_HOST` to our version of the file.
Conflicts:
- app/controllers/application_controller.rb:
Upstream added an `include` where we had an extra `include` due to
glitch-soc's theming system.
Added upstream's new `include`.
Conflicts:
- `db/migrate/20180831171112_create_bookmarks.rb`:
Upstream ran a lint fix on this file, but this file is different in
glitch-soc because the feature was added much earlier.
Ran the lint fix on our own version of the file.
Conflicts:
- `app/serializers/initial_state_serializer.rb`:
Upstream renamed an initial state parameter, where we had extra ones.
Renamed as upstream did.
- `app/workers/feed_insert_worker.rb`:
Upstream wrapped database query in a block, we had extra database
queries because of the DM timeline.
Moved everything in the block.
* Fix attachments getting processed despite failing content-type validation
* Add a restrictive ImageMagick security policy tailored for Mastodon
* Fix misdetection of MP3 files with large cover art
* Reject unprocessable audio/video files instead of keeping them unchanged
Conflicts:
- `config/webpack/generateLocalePacks.js`:
A dependency update changed how functions are imported.
Also, some linting fixes not applicable to glitch-soc.
Conflicts:
- `.github/dependabot.yml`:
Upstream made changes, but we had removed it.
Discarded upstream changes.
- `.rubocop_todo.yml`:
Upstream regenerated the file, we had some glitch-soc-specific ignores.
- `app/models/account_statuses_filter.rb`:
Minor upstream code style change where glitch-soc had slightly different code
due to handling of local-only posts.
Updated to match upstream's code style.
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Upstream moved ActiveRecord callback definitions, glitch-soc had an extra one.
Moved the definitions as upstream did.
- `app/services/backup_service.rb`:
Upstream rewrote a lot of the backup service, glitch-soc had changes because
of exporting local-only posts.
Took upstream changes and added back code to deal with local-only posts.
- `config/routes.rb`:
Upstream split the file into different files, while glitch-soc had a few
extra routes.
Extra routes added to `config/routes/settings.rb`, `config/routes/api.rb`
and `config/routes/admin.rb`
- `db/schema.rb`:
Upstream has new migrations, while glitch-soc had an extra migration.
Updated the expected serial number to match upstream's.
- `lib/mastodon/version.rb`:
Upstream added support to set version tags from environment variables, while
glitch-soc has an extra `+glitch` tag.
Changed the code to support upstream's feature but prepending a `+glitch`.
- `spec/lib/activitypub/activity/create_spec.rb`:
Minor code style change upstream, while glitch-soc has extra tests due to
`directMessage` handling.
Applied upstream's changes while keeping glitch-soc's extra tests.
- `spec/models/concerns/account_interactions_spec.rb`:
Minor code style change upstream, while glitch-soc has extra tests.
Applied upstream's changes while keeping glitch-soc's extra tests.
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/styles/mastodon/forms.scss`:
Conflict because we ran eslint autofix on upstream files.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Code style changes but we have a different version.
Kept our version.
- `streaming/index.js`:
Upstream fixed a typo close to glitch-soc-only code.
Applied upstream's changes.
Conflicts:
- `.github/dependabot.yml`:
Updated upstream, removed in glitch-soc to disable noise.
Kept removed.
- `CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md`:
Upstream updated to a new version of the covenant, but I have not read it
yet, so kept unchanged.
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Not a real conflict, one upstream dependency updated textually too close to
the glitch-soc only `hcaptcha` dependency.
Applied upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/admin/base_controller.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Applied upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/application_controller.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Applied upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/disputes/base_controller.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Applied upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/relationships_controller.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Applied upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/statuses_cleanup_controller.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Applied upstream changes.
- `app/helpers/application_helper.rb`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Applied upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/mastodon/features/compose/components/compose_form.jsx`:
Upstream added a highlight animation for onboarding, while we changed the
max character limit.
Applied our local changes on top of upstream's new version.
- `app/views/layouts/application.html.haml`:
Minor conflict due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Applied upstream changes.
- `stylelint.config.js`:
Upstream added ignore paths, glitch-soc had extra ignore paths.
Added the same paths as upstream.
* Run rubocop --autocorrect on app/, config/ and lib/, also manually fix some remaining style issues
* Run rubocop --autocorrect-all on db/
* Run rubocop --autocorrect-all on `spec/` and fix remaining issues
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Upstream added a link to the roadmap, but we have a completely different README.
Kept ours.
- `app/models/media_attachment.rb`:
Upstream upped media attachment limits.
Updated the default according to upstream's.
- `db/migrate/20180831171112_create_bookmarks.rb`:
Upstream changed the migration compatibility level.
Did so too.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream refactored this file but we have a different version.
Kept our version.
- `app/controllers/settings/preferences_controller.rb`:
Upstream completely refactored user settings storage, and glitch-soc has a
different set of settings.
The file does not directly references individual settings anymore.
Applied upstream changes.
- `app/lib/user_settings_decorator.rb`:
Upstream completely refactored user settings storage, and glitch-soc has a
different set of settings.
The file got removed entirely.
Removed it as well.
- `app/models/user.rb`:
Upstream completely refactored user settings storage, and glitch-soc has a
different set of settings.
References to individual settings have been removed from the file.
Removed them as well.
- `app/views/settings/preferences/appearance/show.html.haml`:
Upstream completely refactored user settings storage, and glitch-soc has a
different set of settings.
Applied upstream's changes and ported ours back.
- `app/views/settings/preferences/notifications/show.html.haml`:
Upstream completely refactored user settings storage, and glitch-soc has a
different set of settings.
Applied upstream's changes and ported ours back.
- `app/views/settings/preferences/other/show.html.haml`:
Upstream completely refactored user settings storage, and glitch-soc has a
different set of settings.
Applied upstream's changes and ported ours back.
- `config/settings.yml`:
Upstream completely refactored user settings storage, and glitch-soc has a
different set of settings.
In particular, upstream removed user-specific and unused settings.
Did the same in glitch-soc.
- `spec/controllers/application_controller_spec.rb`:
Conflicts due to glitch-soc's theming system.
Mostly kept our version, as upstream messed up the tests.
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Upstream switched to pushing to both DockerHub and GitHub Container
Repository, while glitch-soc was already pushing to the latter only.
Updated our configuration to be slightly more consistent with upstream's
naming and styling, but kept our behavior.
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Updated dependencies textually too close to glitch-soc only hcaptcha
dependency.
Updated dependencies as upstream did.
- `README.md`:
Upstream updated its README, but we have a completely different one.
Kept our README, though it probably should be reworked at some point.
- `app/views/auth/sessions/two_factor.html.haml`:
Minor style fix upstream that's on a line glitch-soc removed because
of its different theming system.
Kept our file as is.
- `spec/controllers/health_controller_spec.rb`:
This file apparently did not exist upstream, upstream created it with
different contents but it is functionally the same.
Switched to upstream's version of the file.
- `spec/presenters/instance_presenter_spec.rb`:
Upstream changed the specs around `GITHUB_REPOSITORY`, while glitch-soc
had its own code because it's a fork and does not have the same default
source URL.
Took upstream's change, but with glitch-soc's repo as the default case.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream dependencies textually too close to a glitch-soc only one.
Updated dependencies as upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Upstream README has been changed, but we have a completely different one.
Kept our `README.md`.
- `lib/sanitize_ext/sanitize_config.rb`:
Upstream added support for more incoming HTML tags (a large subset of what
glitch-soc accepts).
Change the code style to match upstream's but otherwise do not change our
code.
- `spec/lib/sanitize_config_spec.rb`:
Upstream added support for more incoming HTML tags (a large subset of what
glitch-soc accepts).
Kept our version, since the tests are mostly glitch-soc's, except for cases
which are purposefuly different.
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Upstream updated `docker/build-push-action`, and we a different config
for `docker/metadata-action` so the lines directly above were different,
but it's not a real conflict.
Upgraded `docker/build-push-action` as upstream did.
- `app/javascript/mastodon/features/compose/components/compose_form.js`:
Upstream changed the codestyle near a line we had modified to accommodate
configurable character count.
Kept our change.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Discarded upstream changes: we have our own README
- `app/controllers/follower_accounts_controller.rb`:
Port upstream's minor refactoring
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Upstream changed how docker images were built, including how
they were cached.
I don't know much about it, so applied upstream's changes.
- `app/controllers/admin/domain_blocks_controller.rb`:
The feature, that was in glitch-soc, got backported upstream.
It also had a few fixes upstream, so those have been ported!
- `app/javascript/packs/admin.js`:
Glitch-soc changes have been backported upstream. As a result,
some code from `app/javascript/core/admin.js` got added upstream.
Kept our version since our shared Javascript already has that feature.
- `app/models/user.rb`:
Upstream added something to distinguish unusable and unusable-because-moved
accounts, while glitch-soc considers moved accounts usable.
Took upstream's code for `functional_or_moved?` and made `functional?`
call it.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Upstream cleaned up code style a bit, on a line that we had custom changes
for.
Applied upstream's change while keeping our change.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream adopted one CSP directive we already had.
The conflict is because of our files being structurally different, but the
change itself was already part of glitch-soc.
Kept our version.
Conflicts:
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Our config file is pretty different from upstream.
Upstream changed CSP directive `script-src` to include
`wasm-unsafe-eval` instead of `unsafe-eval`, which we
did not include.
Added `wasm-unsafe-eval` to `script-src` to fix
execution of the OCR web worker.
- `package.json`:
Upstream updated a dependency (`array-includes`) textually
adjacent to a glitch-soc-only dependency (`atrament`).
Updated `array-includes` as upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `app/views/admin/announcements/edit.html.haml`:
Upstream change too close to theming-related glitch-soc change.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/views/admin/announcements/new.html.haml`
Upstream change too close to theming-related glitch-soc change.
Ported upstream changes.
When storing files in S3, paperclip is configured with a Cache-Control header
indicating the file is immutable, however no such header was added when using
OpenStack storage.
Luckily Paperclip's fog integration makes this trivial, with a simple
`fog_file` `Cache-Control` default doing the trick.
Some "S3 Compatible" storage providers (Cloudflare R2 is one such example) don't support setting ACLs on individual uploads with the `x-amz-acl` header, and instead just have a visibility for the whole bucket. To support uploads to such providers without getting unsupported errors back, lets use a black `S3_PERMISSION` env var to indicate that these headers shouldn't be sent.
This is tested as working with Cloudflare R2.
