1
0
REI-Fixed/app/javascript/mastodon/features/account_timeline/containers/header_container.js

134 lines
4.3 KiB
JavaScript
Raw Normal View History

import React from 'react';
import { connect } from 'react-redux';
import { makeGetAccount } from '../../../selectors';
import Header from '../components/header';
import {
followAccount,
unfollowAccount,
unblockAccount,
unmuteAccount,
pinAccount,
unpinAccount,
} from '../../../actions/accounts';
import {
mentionCompose,
directCompose,
} from '../../../actions/compose';
Optional notification muting (#5087) * Add a hide_notifications column to mutes * Add muting_notifications? and a notifications argument to mute! * block notifications in notify_service from hard muted accounts * Add specs for how mute! interacts with muting_notifications? * specs testing that hide_notifications in mutes actually hides notifications * Add support for muting notifications in MuteService * API support for muting notifications (and specs) * Less gross passing of notifications flag * Break out a separate mute modal with a hide-notifications checkbox. * Convert profile header mute to use mute modal * Satisfy eslint. * specs for MuteService notifications params * add trailing newlines to files for Pork :) * Put the label for the hide notifications checkbox in a label element. * Add a /api/v1/mutes/details route that just returns the array of mutes. * Define a serializer for /api/v1/mutes/details * Add more specs for the /api/v1/mutes/details endpoint * Expose whether a mute hides notifications in the api/v1/relationships endpoint * Show whether muted users' notifications are muted in account lists * Allow modifying the hide_notifications of a mute with the /api/v1/accounts/:id/mute endpoint * make the hide/unhide notifications buttons work * satisfy eslint * In probably dead code, replace a dispatch of muteAccount that was skipping the modal with launching the mute modal. * fix a missing import * add an explanatory comment to AccountInteractions * Refactor handling of default params for muting to make code cleaner * minor code style fixes oops * Fixed a typo that was breaking the account mute API endpoint * Apply white-space: nowrap to account relationships icons * Fix code style issues * Remove superfluous blank line * Rename /api/v1/mutes/details -> /api/v2/mutes * Don't serialize "account" in MuteSerializer Doing so is somewhat unnecessary since it's always the current user's account. * Fix wrong variable name in api/v2/mutes * Use Toggle in place of checkbox in the mute modal. * Make the Toggle in the mute modal look better * Code style changes in specs and removed an extra space * Code review suggestions from akihikodaki Also fixed a syntax error in tests for AccountInteractions. * Make AddHideNotificationsToMute Concurrent It's not clear how much this will benefit instances in practice, as the number of mutes tends to be pretty small, but this should prevent any blocking migrations nonetheless. * Fix up migration things * Remove /api/v2/mutes
2017-11-15 11:56:41 +09:00
import { initMuteModal } from '../../../actions/mutes';
import { initBlockModal } from '../../../actions/blocks';
import { initReport } from '../../../actions/reports';
import { openModal } from '../../../actions/modal';
import { blockDomain, unblockDomain } from '../../../actions/domain_blocks';
import { defineMessages, injectIntl, FormattedMessage } from 'react-intl';
import { unfollowModal } from '../../../initial_state';
import { List as ImmutableList } from 'immutable';
const messages = defineMessages({
unfollowConfirm: { id: 'confirmations.unfollow.confirm', defaultMessage: 'Unfollow' },
blockDomainConfirm: { id: 'confirmations.domain_block.confirm', defaultMessage: 'Hide entire domain' },
});
const makeMapStateToProps = () => {
const getAccount = makeGetAccount();
const mapStateToProps = (state, { accountId }) => ({
Change IDs to strings rather than numbers in API JSON output (#5019) * Fix JavaScript interface with long IDs Somewhat predictably, the JS interface handled IDs as numbers, which in JS are IEEE double-precision floats. This loses some precision when working with numbers as large as those generated by the new ID scheme, so we instead handle them here as strings. This is relatively simple, and doesn't appear to have caused any problems, but should definitely be tested more thoroughly than the built-in tests. Several days of use appear to support this working properly. BREAKING CHANGE: The major(!) change here is that IDs are now returned as strings by the REST endpoints, rather than as integers. In practice, relatively few changes were required to make the existing JS UI work with this change, but it will likely hit API clients pretty hard: it's an entirely different type to consume. (The one API client I tested, Tusky, handles this with no problems, however.) Twitter ran into this issue when introducing Snowflake IDs, and decided to instead introduce an `id_str` field in JSON responses. I have opted to *not* do that, and instead force all IDs to 64-bit integers represented by strings in one go. (I believe Twitter exacerbated their problem by rolling out the changes three times: once for statuses, once for DMs, and once for user IDs, as well as by leaving an integer ID value in JSON. As they said, "If you’re using the `id` field with JSON in a Javascript-related language, there is a very high likelihood that the integers will be silently munged by Javascript interpreters. In most cases, this will result in behavior such as being unable to load or delete a specific direct message, because the ID you're sending to the API is different than the actual identifier associated with the message." [1]) However, given that this is a significant change for API users, alternatives or a transition time may be appropriate. 1: https://blog.twitter.com/developer/en_us/a/2011/direct-messages-going-snowflake-on-sep-30-2011.html * Additional fixes for stringified IDs in JSON These should be the last two. These were identified using eslint to try to identify any plain casts to JavaScript numbers. (Some such casts are legitimate, but these were not.) Adding the following to .eslintrc.yml will identify casts to numbers: ~~~ no-restricted-syntax: - warn - selector: UnaryExpression[operator='+'] > :not(Literal) message: Avoid the use of unary + - selector: CallExpression[callee.name='Number'] message: Casting with Number() may coerce string IDs to numbers ~~~ The remaining three casts appear legitimate: two casts to array indices, one in a server to turn an environment variable into a number. * Back out RelationshipsController Change This was made to make a test a bit less flakey, but has nothing to do with this branch. * Change internal streaming payloads to stringified IDs as well Per https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/pull/5019#issuecomment-330736452 we need these changes to send deleted status IDs as strings, not integers.
2017-09-20 21:53:48 +09:00
account: getAccount(state, accountId),
domain: state.getIn(['meta', 'domain']),
identity_proofs: state.getIn(['identity_proofs', accountId], ImmutableList()),
});
return mapStateToProps;
};
const mapDispatchToProps = (dispatch, { intl }) => ({
onFollow (account) {
if (account.getIn(['relationship', 'following']) || account.getIn(['relationship', 'requested'])) {
if (unfollowModal) {
dispatch(openModal('CONFIRM', {
message: <FormattedMessage id='confirmations.unfollow.message' defaultMessage='Are you sure you want to unfollow {name}?' values={{ name: <strong>@{account.get('acct')}</strong> }} />,
confirm: intl.formatMessage(messages.unfollowConfirm),
onConfirm: () => dispatch(unfollowAccount(account.get('id'))),
}));
} else {
dispatch(unfollowAccount(account.get('id')));
}
} else {
dispatch(followAccount(account.get('id')));
}
},
onBlock (account) {
if (account.getIn(['relationship', 'blocking'])) {
dispatch(unblockAccount(account.get('id')));
} else {
dispatch(initBlockModal(account));
}
},
onMention (account, router) {
dispatch(mentionCompose(account, router));
},
onDirect (account, router) {
dispatch(directCompose(account, router));
},
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-28 23:00:35 +09:00
onReblogToggle (account) {
if (account.getIn(['relationship', 'showing_reblogs'])) {
dispatch(followAccount(account.get('id'), { reblogs: false }));
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-28 23:00:35 +09:00
} else {
dispatch(followAccount(account.get('id'), { reblogs: true }));
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-28 23:00:35 +09:00
}
},
onEndorseToggle (account) {
if (account.getIn(['relationship', 'endorsed'])) {
dispatch(unpinAccount(account.get('id')));
} else {
dispatch(pinAccount(account.get('id')));
}
},
onNotifyToggle (account) {
if (account.getIn(['relationship', 'notifying'])) {
dispatch(followAccount(account.get('id'), { notify: false }));
} else {
dispatch(followAccount(account.get('id'), { notify: true }));
}
},
onReport (account) {
dispatch(initReport(account));
},
onMute (account) {
if (account.getIn(['relationship', 'muting'])) {
dispatch(unmuteAccount(account.get('id')));
} else {
Optional notification muting (#5087) * Add a hide_notifications column to mutes * Add muting_notifications? and a notifications argument to mute! * block notifications in notify_service from hard muted accounts * Add specs for how mute! interacts with muting_notifications? * specs testing that hide_notifications in mutes actually hides notifications * Add support for muting notifications in MuteService * API support for muting notifications (and specs) * Less gross passing of notifications flag * Break out a separate mute modal with a hide-notifications checkbox. * Convert profile header mute to use mute modal * Satisfy eslint. * specs for MuteService notifications params * add trailing newlines to files for Pork :) * Put the label for the hide notifications checkbox in a label element. * Add a /api/v1/mutes/details route that just returns the array of mutes. * Define a serializer for /api/v1/mutes/details * Add more specs for the /api/v1/mutes/details endpoint * Expose whether a mute hides notifications in the api/v1/relationships endpoint * Show whether muted users' notifications are muted in account lists * Allow modifying the hide_notifications of a mute with the /api/v1/accounts/:id/mute endpoint * make the hide/unhide notifications buttons work * satisfy eslint * In probably dead code, replace a dispatch of muteAccount that was skipping the modal with launching the mute modal. * fix a missing import * add an explanatory comment to AccountInteractions * Refactor handling of default params for muting to make code cleaner * minor code style fixes oops * Fixed a typo that was breaking the account mute API endpoint * Apply white-space: nowrap to account relationships icons * Fix code style issues * Remove superfluous blank line * Rename /api/v1/mutes/details -> /api/v2/mutes * Don't serialize "account" in MuteSerializer Doing so is somewhat unnecessary since it's always the current user's account. * Fix wrong variable name in api/v2/mutes * Use Toggle in place of checkbox in the mute modal. * Make the Toggle in the mute modal look better * Code style changes in specs and removed an extra space * Code review suggestions from akihikodaki Also fixed a syntax error in tests for AccountInteractions. * Make AddHideNotificationsToMute Concurrent It's not clear how much this will benefit instances in practice, as the number of mutes tends to be pretty small, but this should prevent any blocking migrations nonetheless. * Fix up migration things * Remove /api/v2/mutes
2017-11-15 11:56:41 +09:00
dispatch(initMuteModal(account));
}
},
onBlockDomain (domain) {
dispatch(openModal('CONFIRM', {
message: <FormattedMessage id='confirmations.domain_block.message' defaultMessage='Are you really, really sure you want to block the entire {domain}? In most cases a few targeted blocks or mutes are sufficient and preferable. You will not see content from that domain in any public timelines or your notifications. Your followers from that domain will be removed.' values={{ domain: <strong>{domain}</strong> }} />,
confirm: intl.formatMessage(messages.blockDomainConfirm),
onConfirm: () => dispatch(blockDomain(domain)),
}));
},
onUnblockDomain (domain) {
dispatch(unblockDomain(domain));
},
onAddToList(account){
dispatch(openModal('LIST_ADDER', {
accountId: account.get('id'),
}));
},
});
export default injectIntl(connect(makeMapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(Header));